Germany surrenders to Islam, replacing Socrates by Mohammed! The German Council of Science and Humanities(GCSH), composed of senior government officials and professors, called for institutes of Islamic theology to be established, squandering the hard-earned money of German taxpayers on a terrorist religion. GCSH asserts the training of imams and Muslim schoolteachers should be an accepted program of study awarded with a university degree.
Chancellor Merkel is bewildered, but Germany’s education minister Annette Schavan welcomes the council’s stupid decision. He considerss training Muslim religion teachers and developing Islamic studies a part of a decisive integration policy in a modern society. Quran calls for hatred, misogyny, polygyny, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. Quran calls for Muslims to kill infidels, to terrorize infidels, and to fulfil their duty to wage war, the violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every motherfucker Muslim ape, Islam is to rule the world by the sword. Quran is clearly antisemitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs. Quran is similar to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, but Bible is similar to Aesop’s Fables.
A religulous advisory panel had been working on a report over the last two years focused on reforming the teaching of theology at Germany universities, in particular Christian, Jewish, and Islamic theology. Mohammed was a charlatan, a bipolar maniac, a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and a misogynist. Islamic tradition tells us how Mohammed had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side. Here is an emoticon of Mohammed with a lit bomb in his turban *-O)):-{>
Mumbojumbo Islamic studies at German universities mainly focus in a neutral way on history and art. A department has been set up at one German university, however, in the western city of Muenster, to train schoolteachers to teach Islam to children. The small department offers courses on the Koran and other topics to aspiring Muslim schoolteachers, but most teachers currently teaching Muslim children in German schools are trained in terrorist Turkey. Basil Venitis, twitter.com/Venitis, points out Turcoterrorists wreak havoc in Fourth Reich(EU), especially Cyprus and many islands of Aegean Sea, the Greek archipelago.
Moreover, Turkey has declared casus belli against Fourth Reich. Nevertheless, terrorist Turkey has the nerve to apply for Fourth Reich membership! If this is not a joke, what is it? Venitis asserts that Fourth Reich should embargo terrorist Turkey. If NATO wants to save its inegrity, it should expel terrorist Turkey right now, and throw the terrorist Turkish troops out of North Cyprus now. Allah il Allah!
In terrorist Islam, theology studies using western academic methods have been viewed with suspicion, especially history and philosophy studies which track changes over time in doctrines. Sharia means the slavish domination of women, rule by Muslims, intolerance of and discrimination towards non-Muslims, and the end of freedom. Ironically, our soldiers are now fighting foreign wars, suffering and dying for societies that are committed to the enforcement of Sharia, while at the same time we have to fight against the forces of Sharia in this country. Let those motherfucker Muslims fight between themselves, not with us. Let them kill each other, not our boys. Our mere presence in Islamist countries, automatically makes us a target, uniting all these motherfuckers against us.
Bekir Alboga, spokesman for Germany’s coordinating committee of Muslim organizations, demands that at least in the initial stages, Muslim groups should influence over who would be offering the courses and their content. Venitis asserts that the clash of cultures has erupted. Islam is not a religion, but a satanic terrorist cacoculture. Sure, it has a grudge-collecting god, and an afterlife with 72 virgins for each martyr. But in its essence, Islam is a political ideology and sadomasochism. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means submission. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is the incivility of terrorist sharia.
At present, Germany is home to around five million Muslims out of a total population of just over 80 million. Turcoterrorists plan to Islamize Fourth Reich(EU) within two centuries! Illegal immigration and birth rate statistics show this is possible. Muslim families have five children in average, compared to a European average of two and a Greek average of one. There are six million Muslims in France, five million in Germany, four million in UK, one million in Belgium, one million in Holland, one million in Italy, half million in Spain, half million in Austria, and half million in Greece.
Muslims can never understand Socrates. Socrates’s famous method was the dialectic, from the Greek word that suggests both discussion and analytical sorting. The purpose of dialectic was to strip away the false knowledge and incoherent opinion that most people inherit from their societies and unthinkingly depend on to manage their lives. Although Socrates claimed to doubt that he or anyone else could acquire true knowledge about the good and virtue and the beautiful, he nonetheless believed that examination, critical consciousness applied to questions of virtue and the good, could eliminate false knowledge and muddled opinion.
Socrates saw rational examination and pursuit of truth and virtue as the essence of what a human being is and the highest expression of human nature. That is why he chose to die rather than to give it up: The unexamined life, he said, is no worth living. But Muslims understand the dialogue in a way that differs sharply from that of Westerners. For them, dialogue does not mean an attempt to rationally debate a topic in order to arrive at the truth. Truth is already given. It’s called sharia, and the only dialogue that is acceptable is one that will eventually lead to the implementation of sharia.
Many countries have started exit programs for Islamoterrorists, squandering taxpayers’ hard-earned money on rehabilitaring these motherfuckers. But exit programs work best when Islamoterrorists are losing. In Egypt, the members of the Islamic Group and Islamic Jihad joined exit programs only after their leaderships were arrested and it had become obvious that their campaigns were going nowhere. Even in Iraq, the exit program started working properly only in 2007, when the Sunni insurgency was coming to an end and al-Qaida was virtually defeated in Iraq. Motherfucker Turcoterrorists refuse to join exit programs, because they still rob and rape Cypriots.
Venitis asserts that veil and headscarf are not welcome in Fourth Reich(EU), because they are symbols of women’s subservience, repression, incivility, and an increasingly divided Fourth Reich. Veil and headscarf make women invisible, transfoms women to zombies, invalidate women’s participatory rights, flag women as evil temptresses, oppress women with barbarity, are brands of misogynist Islam, and are a security threat.
We demand EU to understand and lock horns with an ideology, masquerading as a religion, and rein in Muslims who seek to turn Europe into Eurabia, a theocratic state run by Mullahs and those who wield the sword of Islam. Europe is under threat because European tolerance and European generosity towards those of other countries and cultures are being used by intolerant people, in order to promote intolerance. This is a weakness which can be exploited by them for only so long.
Venitis notes that fatwa is a pseudolegal opinion issued by a deranged ayatollah or bishop. They rule whether a given act is obligatory, permitted, or forbidden. Bin Laden appropriated fatwas to launch his attack on the West. Following the form of the fatwa, bin Laden combed religious texts including the Quran and the Hadith for anything to justify mass murder: Fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them, seize them, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem. The head of al Qaeda vowed to fight as long as it took, never quit, and find any way he could to kill, humiliate, and dishonor the infidels.
In 1988, Salman Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses was published in its English-language original edition. Its publication led the satanic Iranian State and its satanic leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, to issue a fatwa against Rushdie and offer a hefty bounty for his murder. This triggered several attacks on the novel’s translators and publishers, including the murder of Japanese translator Hitoshi Igarashi. Millions of Muslims around the world who had never read a single line of the book, and who had never even heard of Rushdie before, wanted to see the death sentence against the author carried out.
Blasphemy is publishing or uttering matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, intentionally causing outrage among a substantial number of adherents of that religion. It’s scary to think that a progressive state would drag out antiquated laws to suppress freedom of speech. Sometimes you have to shake your head and wonder how in this day an age a law that supports prosecuting detractors of a two millennia old fairy tale is allowed to be on the books.
Blasphemy violates no one’s rights. To cave in to intimidation and not publish anything religuous freaks feel is offensive is to surrender the crucial principle of free speech. This clash is about respecting man’s right to express his views, however unpopular, in the face of religious attempts to subordinate that right to mystical dogmas. Instead of appeasing the mobs who call for executing anyone offending their faith, the West must support those who share its political ideal of free speech.
Blasphemy laws are both silly and dangerous. It is silly because medieval religious laws have no place in a modern secular republic, where the criminal law should protect people and not ideas. And it is dangerous because it incentivises religious outrage, and because Islamic States are already using the wording of blasphemy laws to promote new blasphemy laws at UN level. Blasphemy laws are unjust, because they silence people in order to protect ideas. In a civilised society, people have a right to express and to hear ideas about religion even if other people find those ideas to be outrageous.
Venitis points out secular society is rejected by religulous freaks. They demand a special position, insisting on special consideration of their religulous feelings. But this is incompatible with freedom of speech, where one must be ready to put up with insults, mockery, and ridicule. Journalists should treat religulous freaks the same way they treat atheists, cultists, spiritualists, spirituals, politicians, philosophers, scientists, artists, and businessmen, integrating them into the Graecoroman tradition of criticism and satire, because they are part of society, not strangers. Blasphemy is including, rather than excluding, religulous freaks.
Islam demands us to surrender, but we follow the molon-lave of Winston Churchill:
We shall fight on the seas and shores.
We shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air.
We shall defend our land whatever the cost maybe.
We shall fight on the beaches.
We shall fight on the landing grounds.
We shall fight in the fields and the streets.
We shall fight in the hills. But…
WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER!